Services: Security Code Review

Find vulnerabilities before your code ships

Most security incidents trace back to code that was never reviewed for vulnerabilities. Secure code review finds those weaknesses during development before attackers do.

The cost of catching it late

Security issues found in production are expensive to fix and carry real business risk. Catching them earlier changes the outcome entirely.

Security bugs found after deployment cost significantly more to remediate than those caught during development. More importantly, they carry reputational, operational, and regulatory risk that a thorough code review helps prevent.

Our approach combines automated scanning, AI-assisted analysis, and expert manual review so you get real findings, not just noise from tools running on their own.

What we look for

We analyse your codebase across four critical areas, covering the vulnerability types most commonly exploited in production systems.

Static Analysis

Static Analysis (SAST)

Injection vulnerabilities, authentication flaws, insecure data handling, and input validation issues across your codebase.
Open-Source Risk

Open-Source Risk (SCA)

Vulnerable or outdated dependencies, licence compliance risks, and unsupported libraries in your software supply chain.
Secret Scanning

Secret Scanning

Hardcoded API keys, tokens, passwords, and cryptographic credentials that should never be in your code.
Coding standards

Secure Coding Standards

Alignment with OWASP Top 10, secure framework usage, error handling, and cryptographic best practices.

How we approach it

We combine automation with human expertise so findings are accurate, relevant, and worth acting on.

Automated scanning

01. Automated Scanning

We run industry-standard tools across your codebase to identify known vulnerability patterns and misconfigurations at scale.
AI assisted review

02. AI-Assisted Expert Review

Our security engineers apply AI-assisted techniques to surface complex, context-specific issues that automated scanning misses — and to cut false positives.
Context aware analysis

03. Context-Aware Analysis

We review how your application behaves in real-world scenarios, so every finding is prioritised by actual risk, not just theoretical severity.

What you get

Every engagement closes with a clear, actionable report your security team and stakeholders can both use.

• A detailed vulnerability report with risk ratings and severity classification
• Code-level findings with specific remediation guidance
• Software composition and dependency risk summary
• An executive summary your stakeholders can read and act on

Why choose e-Lock

Accurate findings, practical remediation, and zero unnecessary complexity. Experience, accuracy, and findings that developers can actually work with.

We combine automation, AI-assisted review, and hands-on expert analysis to deliver findings that are accurate, practical, and developer-friendly. Low false positives. Clear remediation steps. No unnecessary complexity.

With 20+ years of cybersecurity experience and NACSA licensing, we've worked with financial institutions, corporations, and government agencies across Southeast Asia.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about how secure code review works and what to expect from an engagement.

What's the difference between secure code review and a penetration test?

+

Do you need access to our entire codebase?

+

What programming languages and frameworks do you support?

+

How long does a secure code review take?

+

Will your findings be relevant to our developers, not just security teams?

+

Can this be integrated into our SDLC or CI/CD pipeline?

+

Does this support compliance requirements?

+

Ready to review your codebase?

Talk to our security team about scoping a review for your application.
Get in Touch